TripIt/Dopplr: case in point

Remem­ber one of the com­pet­i­tive advan­tages I pointed out for Dopplr ver­sus TripIt ?

Very skilled at con­nect­ing with thought-leaders and the blo­gos­phere: Dopplr launched with an incred­i­ble buzz and this atten­tion is sus­tained. It receives way more cov­er­age than Tripit. This is due to the skills and con­nec­tion of the peo­ples onboard.

Well, a great illus­tra­tion of this came via Stowe Boyd. Here’s his lat­est post:

The Dopplr guys have lis­tened to the users, again:

[from More Dopplr Raumzeit­geist detail: Clus­ter Cities][…]

What we are show­ing are what we call ‘Clus­ter Cities’ which is the basis of some new func­tion­al­ity you might have already noticed if you’re a Dopplr user that’s been study­ing their jour­nal feeds/emails closely.

Rewind to Reboot, Copen­hagen at the end of May 2007. We’re sit­ting on the grass in the sun­shine with a bunch of early Dopplr users, includ­ing Stowe Boyd and Stephanie Booth — when Stephanie is the first to voice some­thing we’ve heard a lot from Dopplr users since: “make my trips more ‘fuzzy’”.

By which, she and oth­ers meant that they would like to see coin­ci­dences in the sur­round­ing area of ‘social space­time’ to their trip — i.e. “show me if there are going to be peo­ple I know nearby the stated des­ti­na­tion of my trip when I’m going to be there, as I’d prob­a­bly like to change my plans a lit­tle to see them.”

This is a cor­ner­stone of our goal to help opti­mise travel for Dopplr users — sur­fac­ing infor­ma­tion about such near coin­ci­dences to let them judge whether to alter their plans to make their trip more worth­while. We’re going to be releas­ing a lot of func­tion­al­ity to exploit fuzzy, social space­time through the early part of 2008, but the first part of it has leaked out into the journal.

More coin­ci­den­sity!

Of course, this is only inter­est­ing in light of this post extract, almost 3 weeks before, on the TripIt blog this time:

We’ll keep track of all the var­i­ous places you’ll be on a trip with­out you hav­ing to man­u­ally enter any­thing. Then we use that data to look for over­laps with your friends. If you’ll be within 20 miles of a friend at any par­tic­u­lar point on our trip, we let you know.

To be fair, when Tripit released this fea­ture, Stowe did a great com­par­i­son and analy­sis of the two ser­vices. But if it had been TripIt releas­ing this sin­gle fea­ture, I’m pretty sure they wouldn’t have got­ten a sin­gle post on Stowe’s blog pretty much just relay­ing their own announce­ment. This is where their DNA/skills show off.

  • Thinking about this a few weeks ago, when I posted a trip to "Boston" because I thought that if I said "Cambridge" it might not reveal some coincidences -- but then I thought it might also have the opposite effect.
  • Woohoo... thanks for posting this. I was just thinking about this a few weeks ago, when I posted a trip to "Boston" because I thought that if I said "Cambridge" it might not reveal some coincidences -- but then I thought it might also have the opposite effect.

    As you well know, Julien, we have a cluster of locations around Houston where our colleagues often travel, and the same thing around Paris -- although of course we might naturally enter "Houston" instead of "Sugar Land" and "Paris" instead of "Clamart" already. Nonetheless, I am glad that the Dopplr guys are so responsive to emerging requirements. This is "agile development" -- a good lesson for our own software groups to learn, methinks.
blog comments powered by Disqus

About

photoby Julien Le Nes­tour
more info here

jln /at/ coreedges [dot] com

Location


Random Quote

Take away my people, but leave my factories and soon grass will grow on the factory floors……Take away my factories, but leave my people and soon we will have a new and better factory. — Andrew Carnegie